Best Swim Vest For 2 Year Old

New resource protection

The State of Chile, misusing the application for protection (constitutional tool specifically created in reverse, ie to defend the citizens of the State ), now try again affect chaiteninos constitutional guarantees, and all citizens who wish to visit that location.

The Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court and said no attempt on his life who wish to remain in Chaitén. The Government has ignored the resolution and, more seriously, the Court of Appeals clears itself now with the elbow as he wrote by hand, by giving this resource processing, which is without foundation, and lead an injunction, in the sense of preventing chaiteninos sleep in your city.

is illegal because it failed opposite direction, but it is mainly because these people do not affect any constitutional guarantee, and because the claim to remain in their city would not incur any illegal or arbitrary.

Moreover, although we forgot that the courts already ruled that such people and their decision will not threaten their life and, for one moment, we accept that they do, well, then there is no arbitrary or unlawful act, because it is not arbitrary or unlawful to accept death. There is no law against it.

Well, we are communing with wagon wheels: the government with his stubbornness in using inadequate tools to tackle a problem, the Judicial Branch to provides for that and the media that uncritically, are pandering to the powers of the State in this farce.

Gigantomastia African Boobs Side View

Census Chaitén citizens to enter and new resources Chaitén

Regarding the issue of Chaitén has emerged another serious irregularities: the registration of persons who enter the city.

This is like a fascist or stalineano treatment: where has been shown to enter a city in Chile people should register?

Many people have reported that a 45 and 8 km from Chaitén police have been barriers to prevent access unless it is recorded in a book kept by police. Amen Heel causing to enter, is the proper treatment of suspects in a crime.

This is absolutely illegal.

chaiteninos I see you have been treated during this time as second-class citizens, field huasos not know how to express and defend their rights. As farms were forced to leave their ILLEGALLY city made them lose their property by the lack of attention to channeled the river and now when I want to return, the welcome is as criminals.

have to remember a penal code provisions that Chile's political authority has forgotten

Article 158. will suffer the penalty of suspension on their grades least half, if you enjoy the income, and the imprisonment in its minimum degree o multa de once a veinte sueldos vitales, cuando prestare servicios gratuitos, el empleado público que arbitrariamente:
4.- Impidiere a un habitante de la República permanecer en cualquier punto de ella, trasladarse de uno a otro o salir de su territorio, en los casos que la ley no lo prohíba ; concurrir a una reunión o manifestación pacífica y legal; formar parte de cualquier asociación lícita, o hacer uso del derecho de petición que le garantiza la ley".

Es lo que está sucediendo: si alguien no quiere empadronarse (orden de la Intendencia Regional, aparentemente), se está IMPIDIENDO a un habitante de la República Chile's stay anywhere it or move from one place to another. The

chaiteninos should report it to the Public Ministry to investigate who gave the order, so that that person is suspended from his public employment and pay a fine.

addition, protection may resort to the Court of Appeals to lift the measure. -----------------





Another issue where the authority incurs misconduct is the threat of individual protection resources. This is nothing more than an emotional reaction to the adverse ruling, because that same failure already said that, despite the risk that might exist in the place, chaiteninos no attempt on his life if they wished to remain or enter the city. And this is important because it allegedly violated the constitutional guarantee and that allowed the filing of the appeal was the Right to Life. If you already Suprmea Court has said that no attempt on his life, there is no possibility that such cases announced resources and prosper.