shark Madoff and Chilean banking system: is not the same? What will Foxley
Whenever I am more convinced that the banks operate, as the case Ponzi and Madoff, like a pyramid.
Not paid to new investors in the banks (who make deposits in search of an interest), with dishes ranging entering new clients?
What is not true that if bank customers start to hastily make their money, as happened with Madoff, it is clear the pyramid and can not return the money?
And is not it true that when the stampede happens, all previous investors did indeed got their profits?
In short ... it seems that either all or nothing is crime. MARIO AGUILA
Thursday, December 18, 2008
Friday, December 5, 2008
Thursday, December 4, 2008
Difference Between Regular Chi And Chi Air
eliminates
VTR Linda's move. They CNN Chile, supposedly free, but at the cost of that now for CNN International is to pay $ 10,000 (to install a decoder) and monthly $ 1,900 extra to the current plan. From one day to another I have got a channel I have from the late 80
I think the abuse of dominant position in the cable TV market, the market relevant to this case is obvious. In an effort to encourage additional purchases have eliminated a channel that has been since the inception of cable TV and in particular it was one of the most viewed by the undersigned. Antitrust Attorney
Hopefully, with powers to act ex officio, initiate the investigation of rigor to restore the right in this case of abuse against consumers.
On the other hand, and higher courts have established that VTR can not delete a channel, so arbitrary, notwithstanding an authorization to do so in the contracts given to the company to do so, because they are contracts of adhesion. View
ruling in June 2008 HERE. MARIO AGUILA
I think the abuse of dominant position in the cable TV market, the market relevant to this case is obvious. In an effort to encourage additional purchases have eliminated a channel that has been since the inception of cable TV and in particular it was one of the most viewed by the undersigned. Antitrust Attorney
Hopefully, with powers to act ex officio, initiate the investigation of rigor to restore the right in this case of abuse against consumers.
On the other hand, and higher courts have established that VTR can not delete a channel, so arbitrary, notwithstanding an authorization to do so in the contracts given to the company to do so, because they are contracts of adhesion. View
ruling in June 2008 HERE. MARIO AGUILA
Wednesday, December 3, 2008
Nuts On Clark Coupons
Alejandro Foxley is silly or made?
The Peruvian General is a folly, that is clear. But I thought, however, prudent Foxley was a guy ... until now.
Until now, for where it has been a Foreign Minister of a country requires that the President of another country to dismiss army chief, for any reason? I've never seen, and I doubt that there is a recent historical precedent (perhaps in Roman times can be when the Empire set foot on who he wanted).
Thus, it was obvious that at such descriteriada request, Peru's response could only be that of defending their sovereignty, the autonomy of its executive on the appointment subordinates. Now
Foxley, covered by a Chilean chauvinism worthy of a better use, insists meter legs, and now even the crop, when he says that "Chile would decide clear if this is not arranged ." In other words, it is clear that Alan Garcia will not dismiss the Peruvian General ... then, Foxley keep his word, or is only a Pachot more? Or maybe bound by this stupid threat, "dare to make another silly now heavier gauge? Hopefully
media, the fourth power of this country, they bring sanity to our feverish minister, that no further deepening the gaffe itself incurred, worse than the overall size of the Peruvian misplaced.
The Peruvian General is a folly, that is clear. But I thought, however, prudent Foxley was a guy ... until now.
Until now, for where it has been a Foreign Minister of a country requires that the President of another country to dismiss army chief, for any reason? I've never seen, and I doubt that there is a recent historical precedent (perhaps in Roman times can be when the Empire set foot on who he wanted).
Thus, it was obvious that at such descriteriada request, Peru's response could only be that of defending their sovereignty, the autonomy of its executive on the appointment subordinates. Now
Foxley, covered by a Chilean chauvinism worthy of a better use, insists meter legs, and now even the crop, when he says that "Chile would decide clear if this is not arranged ." In other words, it is clear that Alan Garcia will not dismiss the Peruvian General ... then, Foxley keep his word, or is only a Pachot more? Or maybe bound by this stupid threat, "dare to make another silly now heavier gauge? Hopefully
media, the fourth power of this country, they bring sanity to our feverish minister, that no further deepening the gaffe itself incurred, worse than the overall size of the Peruvian misplaced.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Foxley "break relationships? Because something must be done, and I do not think it has threatened in vain.
in Chile are very few voices rose up to criticize as atalondrada intervention (I understand that theirs is the economy, and this was clear).
I think the supposed national unity to address issues of foreign relations can force us to swallow outbursts of who our leaders. These actions "consensus" are the descriterios smuggle, and even illegal.
Our media, now in Chile, are the same: no question at all the nonsense of Foxley and others.