Regarding the issue of Chaitén has emerged another serious irregularities: the registration of persons who enter the city.
This is like a fascist or stalineano treatment: where has been shown to enter a city in Chile people should register?
Many people have reported that a 45 and 8 km from Chaitén police have been barriers to prevent access unless it is recorded in a book kept by police. Amen Heel causing to enter, is the proper treatment of suspects in a crime.
This is absolutely illegal.
chaiteninos I see you have been treated during this time as second-class citizens, field huasos not know how to express and defend their rights. As farms were forced to leave their ILLEGALLY city made them lose their property by the lack of attention to channeled the river and now when I want to return, the welcome is as criminals.
have to remember a penal code provisions that Chile's political authority has forgotten
Article 158. will suffer the penalty of suspension on their grades least half, if you enjoy the income, and the imprisonment in its minimum degree o multa de once a veinte sueldos vitales, cuando prestare servicios gratuitos, el empleado público que arbitrariamente:
4.- Impidiere a un habitante de la República permanecer en cualquier punto de ella, trasladarse de uno a otro o salir de su territorio, en los casos que la ley no lo prohíba ; concurrir a una reunión o manifestación pacífica y legal; formar parte de cualquier asociación lícita, o hacer uso del derecho de petición que le garantiza la ley".
Es lo que está sucediendo: si alguien no quiere empadronarse (orden de la Intendencia Regional, aparentemente), se está IMPIDIENDO a un habitante de la República Chile's stay anywhere it or move from one place to another. The
chaiteninos should report it to the Public Ministry to investigate who gave the order, so that that person is suspended from his public employment and pay a fine.
addition, protection may resort to the Court of Appeals to lift the measure. -----------------
Another issue where the authority incurs misconduct is the threat of individual protection resources. This is nothing more than an emotional reaction to the adverse ruling, because that same failure already said that, despite the risk that might exist in the place, chaiteninos no attempt on his life if they wished to remain or enter the city. And this is important because it allegedly violated the constitutional guarantee and that allowed the filing of the appeal was the Right to Life. If you already Suprmea Court has said that no attempt on his life, there is no possibility that such cases announced resources and prosper.
0 comments:
Post a Comment