The Peruvian General is a folly, that is clear. But I thought, however, prudent Foxley was a guy ... until now.
Until now, for where it has been a Foreign Minister of a country requires that the President of another country to dismiss army chief, for any reason? I've never seen, and I doubt that there is a recent historical precedent (perhaps in Roman times can be when the Empire set foot on who he wanted).
Thus, it was obvious that at such descriteriada request, Peru's response could only be that of defending their sovereignty, the autonomy of its executive on the appointment subordinates. Now
Foxley, covered by a Chilean chauvinism worthy of a better use, insists meter legs, and now even the crop, when he says that "Chile would decide clear if this is not arranged ." In other words, it is clear that Alan Garcia will not dismiss the Peruvian General ... then, Foxley keep his word, or is only a Pachot more? Or maybe bound by this stupid threat, "dare to make another silly now heavier gauge? Hopefully
media, the fourth power of this country, they bring sanity to our feverish minister, that no further deepening the gaffe itself incurred, worse than the overall size of the Peruvian misplaced.
0 comments:
Post a Comment